<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>infosec4all.com &#187; Consumer security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infosec4all.com/category/consumer-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infosec4all.com</link>
	<description>Information Security Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:15:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft vs. Apple (again)</title>
		<link>http://infosec4all.com/2008/06/03/microsoft-vs-apple-again/</link>
		<comments>http://infosec4all.com/2008/06/03/microsoft-vs-apple-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 02:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Branko S. Bokan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosec4all.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my favorite topics. Does not necessarily mean that Microsoft is more secure than Apple, but provides a counter argument to all those security hobbyists who are ready to take sides. Comparing &#8216;security&#8217; of Microsoft applications against &#8216;security&#8217; of Apple is just like comparing apples and oranges. A research by the Swiss Federal Institute of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite topics. Does not necessarily mean that Microsoft is more secure than Apple, but provides a counter argument to all those security hobbyists who are ready to take sides. Comparing &#8216;security&#8217; of Microsoft applications against &#8216;security&#8217; of Apple is just like comparing apples and oranges.</p>
<p>A research by the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology compared zero-day patch rate of the two. The bottom line - Apple is behind Microsoft when it comes to patching software.</p>
<p>The findings were presented at <a href="http://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-europe-08/bh-eu-08-speakers.html#Frei">BlackHat Europe 2008</a> and are available in <a href="http://www.techzoom.net/papers/blackhat_0day_patch_2008.pdf">PDF</a>, <a href="http://www.techzoom.net/papers/blackhat_0day_patch_presentation_2008.pdf">PPT</a>, and <a href="http://www.techzoom.net/publications/0-day_patch_exposing_vendors_(in)security_performance/index.en">HTML</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://infosec4all.com/2008/06/03/microsoft-vs-apple-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
